Roger Federer

Roger Federer’s SABR

The SABR (or Sneak Attack by Roger). Why Federer used it and should you copy it?

In the 2015 draw of Cincinnati, Roger Federer unleashed a new tactic upon the tennis world. Federer rushed towards the net when receiving serve, taking the ball on the rise. Confused and discombobulated, his opponents would scramble just to get the ball back in play before Roger finished the point with a judicious volley.  

What was this new tactic? It wasn’t anything that anyone else had attempted before. It bore the greatest similarity to the last millennium’s game when courts were significantly faster, and the surface rewarded players more for taking the ball early. But during the American hard court season, Federer had displayed something entirely new.

The SABR (or Sneak Attack by Roger) originally came about when Federer’s longstanding coach, Severin Lüthi, encouraged him to come forward and take the serve further up the court. Federer jokingly took the advice to its logical extreme in a practice session and ventured towards the net while his opponent’s ball was still in the air.

From the success of the shot, a new tactic was born. Federer deployed the SABR throughout the Cincinnati tournament, but notably against Kevin Anderson in the round of 16 and Novak Djokovic in the final.

Federer uses the SABR against Anderson, 2015 Cincinnati

What Are The Technicalities of the SABR?

The SABR can only be attempted by the player returning the serve. When the server begins their toss, and their eyes are on the ball, the returner moves forward as quietly as possible. When the server makes contact with the ball, the returner should make a split-step around one to two feet behind the service line, depending on their appetite for risk.

The aim is to take the ball on the rise so that the server is taken by surprise and is on the defensive from the inception of the point. The returner should continue to move forward and end the point with a volley if needed. Typically, the racquet is held with an eastern backhand grip, so the effect is a flat, deep ball that is difficult to put back in play.

Half-volleying with the backhand grip allows the returner greater lateral coverage, as a forehand grip cannot reliably cover balls heading near the returner’s body or feet due to limited wrist rotation on that side.

Kyrgios’s love and admiration for Federer led to his own attempt at the SABR. The Australian has used the SABR off a first serve in daring and outrageous fashion, though Federer usually opts for the second. Double-handed backhand players can be confident in trying out the shot after Kyrgios’s efforts, particularly as the non-dominant hand on the racquet aids energy transfer for a punchier shot.

Kyrgios tries out the SABR against Zverev, 2017 Beijing

What Are The Costs and Benefits of the SABR?

Firstly, the SABR looks good. If you’re the kind of player who cares as much about style as substance, then it is a visually heroic feat. For the opponent, a successful SABR is mentally disrupting. Not only is there the sudden shock of seeing the returner ready at the net, but the expectation of rally dominance that a service game usually provides has been overthrown.

The server may also feel anxious about what other surprise tactics the returner may employ during the next point. Furthermore, their chance to build momentum and consistency from the baseline has been swiftly denied. But the shot does require a lot of practice. The high ball speeds and limited time can make it easy for the returner to make an error. Even Federer struggled to make a successful SABR every time against Djokovic in the 2015 US Open final, who could counter Federer’s aggression with a lob, leaving him stranded in no man’s land. It is a high risk, high reward tactic. 

Trying The SABR Out In Real Life

Practising and trying the SABR in matches can give their game a real lift for club players. Returning further up the court will test your timing and coordination on the half-volley. In general, taking the ball earlier, especially from the baseline, is a key skill to develop and can help players become more aggressive and keep points short. Moving further up the court will also provide a chance to refine the volleying technique.

This area of tennis, in particular, is becoming somewhat of a lost art among my generation of younger club players, though hopefully, the SABR will be an encouragement towards more netplay. The chance to experiment also makes the game more interesting.

The tactic is a good way to break up traditional patterns of play, bringing a fresh change from extended baseline rallies. The pure excitement of running into the net feels a little cheeky and gives a boost of energy.

Conclusions

federer sabr return

The SABR is a trick shot. It’s slightly flashy, incredibly disruptive for the opponent, and so much fun to play. For Federer, it’s a capsule of his attacking style and a microcosm of his game. It requires timing, skill and a touch of finesse.

In professional matches, Federer has used the SABR as part of an array of net and volleying tactics to gain dominance over the rally quickly. Practising the SABR is an opportunity for club players to sharpen their technique and become emboldened during matches.

Alex Nulliah

My name is Alex Nulliah and I am a tennis writer from Bath. I enjoy writing about tennis, International Relations and anything else which takes my interest. At Exeter University I took a BA in History and an MA in Applied Security Strategy. I love playing tennis.

Related Articles

15 Comments

  1. Thanks so much for this. Fed has tried so many different, exciting things in his tennis career, just as we thought we knew how he plays, he would bring something new to the court. I felt this even after 2016. Miss his tennis just so much…

  2. Is SABR not the oldschool “chip&charge” technique revived?
    And – for some time, Dominic Thiem was also trying a similar technique on return, but doing it a bit differently, so it fitted his game style.
    He was then staying close to the line on return and when the ball was hit by the server, he mas making a step back, then split step and entering 1-2 meters into the court to hit the ball like it was a groundstrok, with half-full backswing instead of block return . Was not coming that far ahead as as Fed, but the shot has the usual dynamic of his groundshots, which the returner would not expect to come from returning. Usually if the returner wants to hit normal heavy groundstroke insted of block return (like Nadal does), starts the return staying far back behind the baseline, so the shot may be hard and deep, but gives the server more time.
    Somehow both chip&charge, SABR and Thiem’s version, which I called Swinging Return, disappeared but are still used by some players once in a match or tournament, lust like underarm serve – a surprise with high chance to get a direct return winner.

    1. It looks al lot like chip and charge indeed. Maybe they didn’t enter the field so much. Jan Siemerink used chip and charge a lot.

  3. Well, I have tried it whiue playing on my level, so the technique was quite poor, but the psychological effect on the server was doing the trick. He was starting to look every time, if I’m coming and was no more focused on his himself, resulting with more serve errors. After 1-2 successful SABR’s the server was under growing pressure and this effect was good enough to try it even regularly. Not easy for an amateur player to find a way to serve aces or serve to the body, so the SABR-maker comes back to his normal returning place very quickly.
    I can recall Boris Becker commenting SABR like – if it was me, I serve always to your body and you stop it quickly 😉

  4. I think, Kyrgios was better at SABR than Fed. Fed was calculating more. Kyrgios was going for fun and crowd, not for points.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button